What You Need to Know About the Executive Assessment

The Executive Assessment (EA) is a standardized exam developed by the Graduate Management Admission Council (GMAC), the organization behind the GMAT. The exam is designed to help business school admissions committees assess the readiness and skills of experienced business professionals who are applying to an Executive Master of Business Administration (EMBA) program. Who Should Take the Executive Assessment? If you are applying to an MBA program of any kind, including an EMBA program, you will almost certainly have to submit standardized test scores as part of the admissions process. Most business school applicants take either the GMAT or GRE to demonstrate their readiness for business school. Not every business school accepts GRE scores, so the GMAT is taken more often. The GMAT and GRE both test your analytical writing, reasoning, and quantitative abilities. The Executive Assessment tests some of those same skills and is meant to replace the GMAT or GRE. In other words, if you are applying to an EMBA program, you can take the Executive Assessment instead of the GMAT or GRE. How Business Schools Use the Executive Assessment Business school admission committees assess your standardized test scores to get a better understanding of your quantitative, reasoning, and communication skills. They want to see if you have the capacity to understand the information being presented to you in a graduate business program. They also want to make sure that you will be able to contribute something to the class discussions and assignments. When they compare your test score to the scores of candidates who are already in the program and scores of other candidates who are applying to the program, they can see where you stand in comparison to your peers. Although test scores arent the only deciding factor in the business school application process, they are important. Getting a test score that is somewhere in the score range for other candidates will only increase your chances of getting accepted to a graduate level business program. The GMAC reports that while most business schools use Executive Assessment scores to assess your readiness for an academic business program, there are some schools that also use your score to help you succeed in the program. For example, a school may determine that you need additional quantitative preparation and recommend a refresher course prior to starting certain courses within the program. Test Structure and Content The Executive Assessment is a 90-minute, computer-adaptive test. There are 40 questions on the test. Questions are split into three sections: integrated reasoning, verbal reasoning, and quantitative reasoning. Youll have 30 minutes to complete each section. There are no breaks. Heres what you should expect on each section of the test: The integrated reasoning section has 12 questions. The question types that youll encounter on this section of the test include multi-source reasoning, graphics interpretation, two-part analysis, and table analysis. To answer the questions, youll have to use your logic and reasoning skills to evaluate information that is presented to you through a graph, table, diagram, chart, or passage of text. The verbal reasoning section consists of 14 questions. Question types include critical reasoning, sentence correction, and reading comprehension. To answer the questions, youll have to read a passage and then answer questions that test your understanding of the text, your ability to evaluate an argument, or your knowledge of grammar in written English. The quantitative reasoning section has 14 questions. Youll encounter just two different types of questions: data sufficiency and problem-solving. Youll need some knowledge of basic arithmetic (fractions, decimals, percents, roots, etc.) and alg ebra (expressions, equations, inequalities, functions, etc.) to answer these questions, but not much more than you would need to know to pass a freshman algebra class in high school. In some cases, youll be asked to solve a math problem; in others, youll be asked to evaluate the information provided in the question to determine if there is enough data to answer the question. Pros and Cons of the Executive Assessment The biggest advantage of the Executive Assessment is that it is specifically designed to test the skills that you have already acquired in your professional career. So unlike the GMAT and GRE, the Executive Assessment does not require you to take a prep course or engage in other forms of expensive, time-consuming preparation. As a mid-career professional, you should already have the knowledge you need to answer the questions on the Executive Assessment. Another plus is that there is no  analytical writing assessment like there is on the GMAT and GRE, so if writing under a tight deadline is difficult for you, youll have one less thing to worry about. There are drawbacks to the Executive Assessment. First off, it costs a little bit more than the GRE and the GMAT. It can also be a challenging test if you don’t have the required knowledge, if you need a math refresher, or if you arent familiar with the test structure. But the biggest drawback is that it is only accepted by a limited number of schools - so taking the Executive Assessment might not fulfill the standardized test score requirements for the school you are applying to. Business Schools That Accept the Executive Assessment The Executive Assessment was first administered in 2016. It is a relatively new exam, so it is not accepted by every business school. Right now, only a handful of  top business schools are using it. However, the GMAC hopes to make the Executive Assessment the norm for EMBA admissions, so it is likely that more and more schools will begin to use the Executive Assessment as time goes by. Before making the decision to take the Executive Assessment instead of the GMAT or GRE, you should check the admissions requirements for your target EMBA program to see what types of test scores are accepted. Some of the  schools that accept Executive Assessment scores from EMBA applicants include: China European International Business School (CEIBS)Columbia Business SchoolDarden School of BusinessIESE Business SchoolINSEADLondon Business SchoolThe University of Chicago Booth School of BusinessThe University of Hong KongUCLA Anderson

Hydrogen Balloon Explosion Experiment

Leonardo Da Vinci Science and Paintings Free Essays

Leonardo Da Vinci: Science and Paintings Leonardo was a polymath which means he was very knowledgeable and had a large number of expertise’s in many different subjects, a polymath is also known as a renaissance man which Leonardo was titled by many people. He was the first to combine math and science together. Da Vinci started the science revolution which revolutionized the way that scientists researched their information ever since. We will write a custom essay sample on Leonardo Da Vinci: Science and Paintings or any similar topic only for you Order Now Leonardo Da Vinci is widely known as one of the greatest painters of all time and has created many iconic and famous paintings. He used his knowledge of science and his artistic talent together to enhance his artwork. He used objects and pieces of objects that would affect the way light appeared on some of his work and used his study of land to enhance and create nature backgrounds and paintings. Leonardo never finished his work in a short period time he always took a few years or more to complete them in means for his most famous pieces. The Mona Lisa is one of the most famous pieces of his collection. Mona Lisa is the best known, most visited, most written about, the most sung about and the most replicated art painting in the world. Mona was a painting of another man’s wife that had been asked to be painted. Leonardo never returned the painting back to the couple even though he was paid to do the painting. This painting was started in 1503/1504 and was worked away at slowly until 1519. The Last Supper is another very famous painting of his. This painting is the most reproduced religious painting of all time. The painting showed Jesus and his twelve disciples eating supper when he announced that one of the disciples would betray him. This painting was started in 1495 and was completed in 1498. How to cite Leonardo Da Vinci: Science and Paintings, Essay examples

Battle of Thermopylae free essay sample

The Spartan army makes a stand at the Hot Gate sees so that the vast umber of Persians cannot overwhelm them. After the Spartan hold steady f or three days, Philters, a deformed Spartan citizen, defects to the Persians and tells them o f a hidden path that leads behind the Spartan. The Persians use this information to defeat the Sp rattans, who make a valiant last stand in which every remaining Spartan dies. The actual Battle of Thermopile was significantly less epic. Herodotus report s a force of over 5000 Greeks, including the 300 Spartan.This entire force was led by Leo Midas. The reason that so few troops were sent is that both the Carnelian festival and the Olympia festival took place during the battle, so cities only wanted to send advanced guards. After sending g a spy, Xeroxes waits for four days for the Greeks to retreat. On the fifth day, Xeroxes sends M Edwina troops to fight and they fall in large numbers to the Greeks. We will write a custom essay sample on Battle of Thermopylae or any similar topic specifically for you Do Not WasteYour Time HIRE WRITER Only 13.90 / page Xeroxes then sends his MIM aortas, expecting them to be more successful. Instead, they fall in similar fashion to the Median forces.Eventually the Persians realize the futility Of fighting the Greeks in the confined space Of the pass, and temporarily retreat. Xeroxes is then approached by Philters, a man from Mali , who betrays the Greek forces for money. Philters reveals the existence of a pathway across t he mountain. This pathway was guarded by 1 000 Physician men, and they were attacked and force deed to retreat from Persian forces. The Physicians told the rest of the Greek soldiers about the flan king Persians, The Greeks considered a full retreat, and everyone was ordered to leave by Leonie dads except for the Spartan, the Thespians, and the Thebes.At sunrise, the remaining Greeks a advanced beyond where the pass is narrowest, knowingly headed to their deaths. Again, the Gar seeks fought well 1 above their numbers, however eventually they succumbed to the Persians. Takes many liberties with history to tell the story of King Leonia. The film Akers portray Leonia and his Spartan as supermen, and their enemies as mythic al monsters. The changes that they knowingly make are made in order to turn the story into a f Lully fledged action movie, and secure a larger audience.In ordered do this, the filmmakers mold historical figures together for simplicity and fabricate events to define Leonia character. Several historical figures were rolled into single movie characters for various r sons. The fact that the Spartan government had two kings was neglected so that El Oneidas could stand out as a wise king who knew better than the senate. The often quoted line in t he film where the Persians boast that their arrows blot out the sun and Leonia quips Then w e shall fight in the shade. is actually attributed to a Spartan named Audiences.Herodotus points out Audiences as distinguishing himself above other Spartan, but the filmmakers give his line t o Leonia to make him the bedaubs one. Two Spartan soldiers were sent away by Leonia because of damage o their eyes, they were tasked with delivering a message to Sparta. One return ins to fight while the other returns to his home. Dildos takes place of these two men in the film, and leads the final charge at the end of the movie. The real Spartan who returned home instead of fighting with Leonia was branded a coward.Again, by ignoring these facts the filmmaker s portray the 1 The History of Herodotus , 201234 Spartan as faultless and loyal. The only other Greeks to appear in the film AR e Arcadian, who are given a small role in fighting the Persians. In fact, soldiers were sent by Ar dada, Mycenae, Corinth, Thespian, Thebes and more. The films portrayal of the Spartan hold nag their line for days on end is ridiculous. Soldiers from different cities took turns fighting and resting. The filmmakers did this to make the Spartan seem even more superhuman.The reason for all of these changes is to capture a larger audience by giving people what they want to see, larger than life heroes fighting for freedom and a pretty girl. The most famous scene in the movie, where Leonia yells This is Sparta! an d kicks Xeroxes messenger down a well is completely made up. Xeroxes never sent a m singer to demand Sprats surrender, because the Spartan had a reputation similar to the one this scene gave them. The scene is included in the film because it establishes Leonia a s a protector of his country and the people in it. Another invented scene is the one where Aphelia sees asks to join the Spartan ranks. Leonia seems remorseful and compassionate when he is UN fortunately unable to use Philters in battle. Again, the filmmakers portray Leonia as a caring kin g who wants only the best for the Greek people. Yet another liberty with history taken by the fill makers is the cone where the Arcadian abandon the fight. We already know that the Arc Diana in the film represent a much more diverse group of Greeks, but the Spartan did not sat ND alone to face their death as they did in the film.The Thespian and Thebes soldiers remained all inside them. The filmmakers made this choice because the Spartan fighting and sacrificing the messes alone is significantly cooler and more meaningful. The reason for these scenes and his tortilla imaginations is to show that Leonia and the Spartan are infallible defender s of freedom, justice, and the Spartan way of life. The film is great for understanding the Battle of Thermopile, if you take it w tit a grain 2 of salt.Some things should be fairly obvious inventions, like the monstrous nature Of the 3 Persian soldiers and the role of the Peppers in preventing Leonia from fight nag. Other things dont necessarily matter, like how Philters is a cripple in the film and the nu embers of the Persians are exaggerated. These changes serve to smooth out the plot and m eke it easier to understand while cutting down on time. A filmmaker has to define the world, and sometimes 4 details have to be sacrificed. However, some aspects of the film are unfortunate for learning history. The Spartan method of training soldiers didnt send lone seven year o old boys to fend for themselves. The Spartan method of government is greatly skewed for the purr poses of the plot. In reality, it involved two separate kings, one for home and another for war, and this film makes no mention of that fact. The film also portrays the Spartan senate as being dice Veda by a young corrupt man. Only retired soldiers over the age of 60 were senators, and they had great reputations and connections to the Spartan people.The misinformation is unfit ordinate, but despite all of this, the film still communicates the basic facts about the Battle of There maypole to its 5 viewers. 300 Spartan and a handful of other Greeks stand against almost numerous S hordes Of Persian invaders. They are betrayed and eventually die while fighting in a valid NT effort. All of 6 this is learned by the people who watch , and that is invaluable. Finding the line between fact and entertainment is difficult, and the film isnt trying to teach. It serves to get 7 people interested in a subject they wouldnt have otherwise noticed.